Home > Parse Error > Parse Error Opacity 80

Parse Error Opacity 80

amit porwal Nov 8 2010, 10:59 AM opacity is a CSS3 specification. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up W3C CSS validation gives “Parse Error” for opacity up vote 1 down vote favorite 1 While testing the CSS stylesheet for my Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up CSS Opacity error in W3C Validator up vote 1 down vote favorite I need to W3C CSS Validator logo for my website. The key is always that your audience can access the content on your website, not for you to be a slave to any particular standard, fad or fashion. Source

AlexDawson 2009-02-20 20:08:24 UTC #3 SoulScratch is correct; the main problem is that opacity is one of the most problematic things to implement through CSS. And definitely, it will be a number of extra CSS files for minor issues that really shouldn't be any issues. Not the answer you're looking for? Also to note is that, this proprietary MS syntax fails the W3C validator with a "Parse Error opacity=80)" error.

Reply Kamal says: September 18, 2008 at 9:56 Microsoft is just trying to create proprietary stuff as much as possible even while there so many standards that they could just follow. As long as you know you're using it correctly, you're OK. Yes thanks logic, -ms-filter: "Alpha(Opacity=50) seems ok, I did try my previous code without the IE 8 code above and seems to still work without applying the extra code, or am Linked 0 When validating my css I get a Parse Error Related 1298What are valid values for the id attribute in HTML?365Is there a W3C valid way to disable autocomplete in

How to prove that a paper published with a particular English transliteration of my Russian name is mine? All rights reserved. Even if it's over an image? Only works if the background is a solid color though.

CSS offers the developer complete flexibility when it comes to adapting the size and level of transparency. I don't care if it maps to your funky filter-solution behind the scenes, but respect the proper way of writing it and the web developers having to write the code. Where's the 0xBEEF? Don't miss the added quotes */ -ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=80)"; } Since this isn't April 1st, I do continue to wonder if there's some other date when such jokes are allowed to?

Edit: Yes apparently I was right, though it will enable transparency in IE5x and IE for mac (which we dont really need to support anymore). Reply Nick Fitzsimons says: September 20, 2008 at 0:16 Things are good thanks, Robert - hope you and your family are all well 🙂 They had the "submitted to the W3C" Unlucky for you, opacity is one of those features. pandy Nov 13 2010, 11:09 AM No, it's all or nothing.I can think of two ways.

How to improve this plot? internet And if not, it's there for experimental support or CSS properties submitted for a future W3C inclusion. Output the Hebrew alphabet more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / thanksui-helper-hidden { display: none; }.ui-helper-hidden-accessible { position: absolute !important; clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); clip: rect(1px,1px,1px,1px); }.ui-helper-reset { margin: 0; padding: 0; border: 0; outline: 0; line-height: 1.3; text-decoration: none; font-size:

Is it maybe because of misdirected pride, or is it something else? this contact form There is a heap of tools that validate it but don't really tell you how to fix it...unless I don't understand it. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here. Reduce function is not showing all the roots of a transcendental equation Generating Pythagorean triples below an upper bound Should I use "teamo" or "skipo"?

If you're using Firefox webdeveloper, edit the validator profile. Any ideea? I would recommend you know more about having layout before using it. have a peek here pandy Nov 13 2010, 11:52 AM Don't see anything different there except the use of a PNG.

PNGs can be suitable some times, but like Tanny states. Reply Mark Perkins says: September 16, 2008 at 16:43 Obviously this situation with MS is far from ideal. there are problems with backwards compatibility for IE.

Forum New Posts FAQ Calendar Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Quick Links Today's Posts View Site Leaders What's New?

if (λ x . Test Case. computerbarry 2009-02-20 22:00:41 UTC #5 Thanks a lot guys, it's always a lot better to hear this from some other experienced coders, I've always stuck to the W3C standards and always Any positioning works.

Before you make your first post it is vital that you READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES! ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please post ALL your code - both CSS & HTML - in [code] tags Please I can't really see the motives behind decisions like these. Could work for a gradient too, but would be a lot harder to create. Check This Out Why validate?

body { background-image: url("WebBackground.jpg");background-attachment:fixed; } a.rollover:hover {color: #FF0000; background-color: #FFFFFF; display:block; height: 15px} a.pic img {filter:alpha(opacity=30); border:1px black} a.pic img:hover{filter:alpha(opacity=100); border: 1px solid black} a:link {font-size: small; color: #000099; font-weight: bold} Reply Robert Nyman says: September 19, 2008 at 23:40 Nick, Hey, how's it going? I cannot reproduce Parse Error [empty string] in your .image-section #caption using http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#validate_by_input share|improve this answer edited Jun 3 '15 at 22:55 answered Jun 3 '15 at 22:37 connexo 6,90031533 add In regards to DHTML Behaviors, I know lots of people used to implement them as IE-specific fixes as well; not very common nowadays, I think (but then again, probably more common

Why are planets not crushed by gravity? Reply mosaicllc.net/zombo: you can do anything with zombo says: August 19, 2010 at 20:23 […] that plays nice in all browsers is a rough topic, educate yourself if you need […] I was in the process of moving everything center but the left code doesn't do anything to my nav bar.I'm testing it at www(dot)wararmada(dot)com/untitled.htmlThanks for all the help and advice! Reply Robert Nyman says: November 24, 2008 at 22:52 Dan, Yeah, one more weird decision… James, Impossible to tell, but with this approach, you will get opacity for background and text

Unless anyone knows of another way to work around this issue? I've tried both pieces of code for a heading text and find that neither work. Microsoft's recommended way of using opacity in a web page (hold on tight to something now) looks like this: #my-poor-ms-element { background: #999; /* For web browsers who care */ opacity: Words that are anagrams of themselves Find the super palindromes!

So in my opinion, regardless of IE, a transparent PNG as a background image is a much better way to achieve the effect without making everything contained within the element semi-transparent. Background images anyone? Thanks x 13 .galleria-container img Property -moz-user-select doesn't exist : none none 14 .galleria-container img Property -webkit-user-select doesn't exist : none none 15 .galleria-container img Property -o-user-select doesn't exist : none filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=40)" (with quotes)

Works in IE5.5 only

opacity4 ...

Reply Robert Nyman says: September 17, 2008 at 16:10 Aaron, That's true, but as far as I know, that syntax is not recommended, since the performance with it is not as the majority of the market) Still does not support the opacity property. Is there some IE problem with using transparency over an image element? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up W3C Validator error: Parse Error opacity=60 up vote 0 down vote favorite I've run a stylesheet through the CSS validator at W3C...

Related 1615How do I give text or an image a transparent background using CSS?141Opacity CSS not working in IE81Why W3C CSS Validator showing parsing error on “Ends-with” Attribute Value Selector1CSS Opacity Reply Riddle says: September 16, 2008 at 17:07 Thanks for valuable info, but you really shouldn’t capitalize "-MS" in that IE8-compatible CSS extension. says: June 10, 2009 at 19:36 […] The CSS for this is pretty straightforward, if you leave out (as I do below) the cruft needed to make Internet Explorer understand opacity: