Home > Parse Error > Parse Error Opacity=10

Parse Error Opacity=10

Geoffrey Sneddon Reply With Quote 08-11-2007,04:26 AM #10 felgall View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Master Coder Join Date Sep 2005 Location Sydney, Australia Posts 9,249 Thanks 4 Thanked 932 Reply With Quote 08-12-2007,12:53 AM #13 Jutlander View Profile View Forum Posts Regular Coder Join Date Jun 2007 Location In my own sick little world :P Posts 425 Thanks 1 Thanked If I remember correctly, to get opacity to work in earlier versions of IE (including IE6), you may need to apply the long handed version as it requires rendering through the RyanReese 2009-02-21 05:54:38 UTC #13 Yea but getting IE6 to work is more manual labor then just typing in a few lines of code, which aren't really all that long. Source

It doesn't validate to the 2.1 level that the validator is probably running at.My advice: don't worry about it. Yes, it is good to have valid semantic code, however the time of having to use hacks and browser specific code is not over and if you are using them for Edit: Yes apparently I was right, though it will enable transparency in IE5x and IE for mac (which we dont really need to support anymore). Stop solving problems you donít yet have! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4385771/css-opacity-error-in-w3c-validator

I'll try it out! If you choose to participate, the online survey will be presented to you when you leave the Technet Web site.Would you like to participate? Human vs apes: What advantages do humans have over apes?

Reply With Quote 08-12-2007,01:57 AM #14 MHaris View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage New Coder Join Date Jun 2007 Posts 60 Thanks 7 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Why Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:12 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Hi, As the issue is specific withInternet Explore Develoment, you may contact Microsoft Internet Explore Last edited by Bill Posters; 08-09-2007 at 08:19 PM. You know why you get the error and that it doesn't harm anything.

line 381 - Parse Error [empty string] line 295 - Parse Error opacity=70) line 308 - attempt to find a semi-colon before the property name. Still with the rapid fall in people using IE instead of a standards compliant browser we probably wont have to worry about IE at all in a few years time. Originally Posted by felgall They could also introduce the hyphenated proprietary styles as alternatives to their invalid versions too for those people who want to use valid CSS but they haven't http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11867694/w3c-validator-error-parse-error-opacity-60 Archive Forgot password? | Register Remember Me?

filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=40) (no quotes)

Works in IE5.5, IE6, IE7 and IE8 RC1

opacity5 ... -ms-filter: "progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(Opacity=40)" (with quotes)

Works in IE8 RC1 only

Reply With Quote 08-11-2007,02:14 PM #11 gsnedders View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage Senior Coder Join Date Jan 2004 Posts 2,340 Thanks 1 Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts Originally What does the image on the back of the LotR discs represent? If the images aren't contained in the block you make transparent, you can position them on top of the transparent background.

If it works perfectly, no need to take the piss of validating the code. http://forum.cs-cart.com/topic/38640-parse-error-opacity0/ Yet they made more progress towards CSS2.1 support than any other browser did during the time IE7 was under development. Probably that way i can tackle the other parse errors. I have a new guy joining the group.

Reply With Quote 08-09-2007,06:57 PM #2 VIPStephan View Profile View Forum Posts Visit Homepage The fat guy next door Join Date Jan 2006 Location Halle (Saale), Germany Posts 10,190 Thanks 6 http://kiloubox.com/parse-error/parse-error-opacity-80.html Why don't browser DNS caches mitigate DDOS attacks on DNS providers? Last edited by gsnedders; 08-10-2007 at 11:26 PM. I'm still having trouble with the nav bar though....http://www.zachgraeve.com/2006/10/01/cente...e-position-div/ This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content.

Should I use "teamo" or "skipo"? pandy Nov 13 2010, 11:09 AM No, it's all or nothing.I can think of two ways. Hope that helps others as you can view the browsercam results to see what works where. have a peek here But it still won't validate fully..heck, I can live with it..

pandy Nov 7 2010, 11:36 PM Browser extensions never validate, unless they get incorporated in a future spec. Any more stupid and useless advice? Click on 'More Options' and select CSS3 from the profiles menu.

PaulOB 2009-02-21 15:11:23 UTC #16 computerbarry: I see, thanks SoulScratch!

Barons Nov 13 2010, 11:58 AM I think I need to add in another div before this will work. Only works if the background is a solid color though. I would agree, supporting transparent PNG's are currently the more obtrusive of the two options (CSS requires less code to accomplish the task of opacity), when IE6 is removed from the Why are planets not crushed by gravity?

I found this and it works great! share|improve this answer answered Aug 8 '12 at 15:16 Scott Brown 5,15022851 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Is this your first visit? Check This Out That's the price you pay for using new features I guess 24th February, 22:42 Post: #3 sparky672 Member Posts: 172 Joined: Jan 2011 Reputation: 0 RE: CSS Validation??

If it works perfectly, no need to take the piss of validating the code. I'm going to need to play around with this for a bit. Test Case. Line #95: filter:alpha(opacity=70); As far as the IE filter opacity property goes, you could implement an additional IE-specific stylesheet after the main stylesheet via conditional comments.

There is no real way you can implement opacity within CSS 2.1 as Opacity itself was only introduced in the CSS 3 specification, and what makes it worse is that for